The banana filter
If an explanation can account equally well for an expected result and its opposite, it is not yet an explanation.
The project’s memory
Much of the UCMT Project grew from repeated attempts to view different phenomena through a single medium. Those texts need not be hidden simply because the project’s centre has shifted.
Here they become a library: a place to reconstruct the path of thought, see changes of language, and distinguish the active research framework from historical branches.
A sequential, almost conversational introduction to the medium model.
Go ↓02How the project learned to distinguish an attractive connection from a testable one.
Go ↓03Heuristics, side thoughts, doubts, and the human layer of research.
Go ↓How the question changed
An attempt to read electrodynamics, gravity, and quantum connectedness as manifestations of a common background.
Foundations, a calibration pipeline, and thematic applications across scales appear.
Models begin to ask not only “can this be explained?” but “what is observable here?”
CQT, transition corpora, and independent tests form a search for a possible grammar of relations.
Read in sequence
The Almanac keeps the project’s original voice: looking at a familiar phenomenon from a different angle and not being afraid of a simple question.
The existing URLs will be preserved when this version is published. The Almanac changes its place in navigation, but it does not disappear.
Research discipline
This layer shows how a language of parameters, clean channels, observation horizons, and controlled comparisons gradually emerged.
The human layer
Not every thought must immediately become a paper. Sometimes the useful thing to preserve is a way of thinking, an unexpected analogy, or a good safeguard against self-deception.
Open all notes →If an explanation can account equally well for an expected result and its opposite, it is not yet an explanation.
An unsuccessful branch often marks the boundary of a method more precisely than one more attractive picture.
Can relations be a more stable subject of inquiry than the selected carriers of those relations?